Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsAnalysisComputerChess Politics
ChessKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Chess Forum / General Topics / September 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
The Kingston Files [no chess in it]18 Sep 2008 08:02 GMT9
Since Taylor Kingston has written consecutively, posts challenging
everything he doesn't quite understand, and has to invent what other people
say 7 TIMES in 4 weeks - while presenting no chessic evidence for anything
whatever - I celebrate him! How difficult this is to get away ...
Why learn the endgame first?17 Sep 2008 17:29 GMT24
I understand that it's crucial to learn the endgame, but it seems to me
that learning the opening and middlegame are just as important (and
certainly no *less* important?). So why does everyone suggest that you
learn the endgame first? What benefit does this provide, and what ...
Outstandingly Beautiful Girl Chess Master Nobody Has Noticed Yet17 Sep 2008 14:47 GMT12
Outstandingly Beautiful Girl Chess Master Nobody Has Noticed Yet
There is an outstandingly beautiful girl chess master that nobody has
noticed yet.
She is a stunning beauty.
nalchik WWC final17 Sep 2008 13:25 GMT1
The third game of the Women's World Championship Final was a tough, 72-move
draw. That left Russian GM Alexandra Kosteniuk in the lead with 2:1 points.
On Wednesday the 14-year-old Chinese has to win with black in the last game
to force a tiebreak. Kosteniuk can pick up the title ...
GetClub Chess Stronger than ever !!!17 Sep 2008 12:30 GMT36
Now, GetClub Chess is playing tremendously strong games.
I played against Rybka & Jester and found it has no error now.
Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
Bilbao17 Sep 2008 00:56 GMT11
They're off, and with different rules. No time increments, and also draw
offers must be approved by the arbiter.
There have already been 2 incidents
in a drawish looking rook endgame Radj and Toppy had to play down to bare
After long time GetClub Chess improved twice.16 Sep 2008 09:00 GMT18
After 2 month, today GetClub Chess was made Twice Stronger by removing
a Buggy code with better code.
Now, GetClub will play much stronger moves !!!.
Last 2 months there was no improvement, But today somehow GetClub was
Games by Help Bot & Taylor Kingston.14 Sep 2008 22:16 GMT4
Today 2 games were played by Help Bot & Taylor Kingston against easy
level.
I find Taylor Kingston too 74 sec / move while Help Bot was taking 45
sec / move.
The sh.t Hits the Fan Today! (Tune in later.)14 Sep 2008 18:42 GMT15
The sh.t Hits the Fan Today! (Tune in later.)
Pls analyze this game of Beginner Level14 Sep 2008 11:22 GMT22
What do you say, What were the wrong moves by Beginner that it should
have avoided?
Game Played between Jester and beginner at GetClub.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer and Counterclaim filed in Polgar vs. USCF, Northern District     of Texas13 Sep 2008 21:47 GMT9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUBBOCK DIVISION
_______________________________________
Opening: be aggressive or no?13 Sep 2008 20:49 GMT42
What I've learned from Chernev's book is that until you've developed your
pieces, you shouldn't try to put together any combinations for attack. If
you are attacked, defend yourself and then continue with development.
Now I'm reading Seirawan and an example game he provides goes:
The USCF does not need a "nice guy" as Executive Director12 Sep 2008 00:30 GMT22
On Aug 5, 5:32 pm, Rob <robmt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bill Hall is a very nice guy from what I have seen. I think he is in a
> position to effect little change and can't make a decision without
> permission from the board first. WHy don't they just sell the USCF to
Constitutionally protected speech??11 Sep 2008 18:47 GMT31
Over on the USCF Issues Forum, Former USCF President Tim Redman is
arguing that the postings by the Fake Sam Sloan were "satire" and
"Constitutionally Protected Speech".
However, calling a female chess personality a "bulldyke" and calling a
U.S. Supreme Court brief in SEC vs. Samuel H. Sloan, 436 US 103 (1978)10 Sep 2008 18:03 GMT3
I am in the process of reprinting the brief I filed in the U.S.
Supreme Court in SEC vs. Samuel H. Sloan, 436 US 103 (1978)
This, plus the oral argument presented to the United States Supreme
Court, resulted in a 9-0 decision in my favor.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 August, 2008
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.