You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Bill Brock's obsession with Sam Sloan as a "former master"
| Niemand | 30 Aug 2005 21:09 |
> I just did a little Google search and I cannot find anywhere that I > said that I am a former master. Perhaps I did write it. I am not > claiming that I did not. However, I cannot remember writing that, > although perhaps I did. Actually, it appears you did not even use the word "former." At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sam_Sloan, you wrote:
"Thus, it is generally accepted as correct to refer to me as a chess master even though my current rating has fallen to Class A."
In what rating system did you attain this "master" level?
|
| Sam Sloan | 30 Aug 2005 20:29 |
Bill Brocks obsession with Sam Sloan as a former master
Bill Brock has asked the same question about 50 times in the past few days:
On 29 Aug 2005 10:00:16 -0700, "politikalhack@gmail.com" <politikalhack@gmail.com> wrote:
>What was your highest published FIDE rating? > >What was your highest published USCF rating? > >What is the basis for your claim to be a "former master"? I just did a little Google search and I cannot find anywhere that I said that I am a former master. Perhaps I did write it. I am not claiming that I did not. However, I cannot remember writing that, although perhaps I did.
Can Bill Brock point to the place where I claimed to be a former master?
Sam Sloan
|
Quick links: