Re: I am hereby suspending "Rob Mitchell" from posting to the FIDE_chess Yahoo Group

The US Marine Corp with air support would have done same, no?

---

Not explicitly so - but I think there was nothing there to interest him. \

Ray Keene is not a big fan of politco's in chess. In fact he smuggled out
Gulko's material from under the KGB's noses [which was an explicit charge
against the regime, and which specific players and organisers acted against
refuseniks, including beating up him and his wife - such as Averbakh,
specifically, who spied on them]

Anyway, for our own Mohammed to quote Pravda is a bit rich!
----

You just nailed his duplicity. And this is the dork who was raised such fuss
about standards the USCF forum, while not in anyone's opinion that I have
read, being even the slightest bit fair himself.

People 'attack' him, according to his own rendition of things. He doesn't
mention that it is his ideas and behavior that they attack, and this is why
you are banned.
------

Be careful what you say, earth man!

But there is also unfair attacks on Sloan - what is important is how he has
prosecuted his case during the past 12 months, which seems to me along
McCarthy lines of intimidation and 'suggestions' of 'questions.

pfft! Crap! He couldn't put his ego behind him and achieve anything. Someone
ALWAYS had to be to blame, and he the hero, like a bad B movie, when the
hero gets to protect the wimmin from the [dumb] injuns. Except Sam, who I
suspect has vagina-envy, attacked the women, his own self.

Phil Innes

Phil,

Ike would have quashed him like a roach .
Even Harry "Too Tall" Sabine gave Ike a wide berth!

I noticed that even Ray Keene had posted there in the past, but ducked
out after he noticed Mohamed El Sloan's lunacy.

I heard from the other party. He said he had been spammed by Sloan
into the group... never even realized he had been banned, and when he
read of his "banning" sent his information. LOL

It may have been Mohamed el Sloan himself!

SO I remain the only "forever banned" person ! Makes me feel like
Lenny Bruce in a way.

Huge egos often come from small intellects.

Oh my God! You are "unlisted"? Maybe only unlisted to Sloan. I hear
the new blocking program makes you invisible to people who you want to
leave you alone.

But did you show him your passport? LOL How do we even know that he is
who he says he is?He may be the spawn of alien experimentation on
Earth women? There are lots of space visitors to Kansas, Nebraska and
Iowa so I have been told.

LOL How sad is that!

Now PT turning Mormon IS the story of a decade!

Respectfully, Rob (Which- Mitch) Earl of Mustard!

I believe our Sam has denied you ever sent him it. But this is a rare
correspondance!! - just think if he actually showed up. Ike would have
slaughtered him on the spot - almost certain impalement in the parking lot

closed set. Isn't it fortunate that Jackie [Ties] Chan never met Mohammed el
Sloan!

My friend Stuart Rubin is not a member either, mostly because he's British -
and just won the senior... and Kaarlo is Dutch, but living in HK, nan ja?

Well, there is that... though cloth-ears is on a mission, look...

You don't seriously expect Mohammed el Sloan to answer this, do you? Shoot!
He is so high up his mullah-tower he probably can't even hear you.

Gosh! Sam has let someone back in who wakes up another poster at 3 am.

Its one of those 'prove who you are' assumption of guilt things. But who is
asking, complainant, prosecutor, judge or jury? Or all 4? What can be fairer
than this  :))))))))))

Sam takes everything very personally, and if you think his ideas are nutz@
that is the same to him as if you wrote that he is nutz@

But this is not the end of this paranoid post - which is truly funny! Maybe
the funniest since Brennan's efforts here: this is what he also wrote:-

""Rob Mitchell" claims that I kicked him out of this group because he
said negative things about me. However, that is not true. As proof of
this, Phil Innes attacks me in this group every day and I have never
suspended him. (By the way, I am beginning to wonder whether Phil
Innes is really named Phil Innes. Why is there no listing for him in
the Vermont telephone book or anywhere else?)"

I first met Sam Sloan in New Windsor at a board meeting where I was
introducing a Russian fella, and was myself introduced by a board member. I
even talked with el Sloan, supported one of his points about the cost of net
service, and use the same name now as then.

I 'attack' Sam Sloan every day means that I do not agree with him, or see
what issue he raises is to the public good. Of course, these days many
people 'attack' Sam Sloan, since he achieved what? as board member? One
motion carried which was to congratulate an organiser.

Whatever next? Having questioned who is this mysterious Paul Truong
character, will he now question Susan Polgar's identity? Maybe there is
really only one Polgar 'sister' and the cunning Truong represents them all
by ninja-photoshop arts learned in the mysterious orient?

Or did Truong turn Mormon and marry all three?

Cordially, The Duke of Mexico, [Montezuma especially], and the Queen of the
May.

Dont you just love hoe Mohamed snipped the truth from his post.
Sloan calling anyone crazy is the pot calling the kettle black. He is
in denial of the truth, so he tells bigger lies to make them
believable. LOL

here is what Sam is afraid for anyone to read:

On Aug 20, 11:02 pm, sl...@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote:

Rob:

for the record, I was posting under the name "robmtchl" . That is
hardly a fake name. Sloans legal name is not "Sam" . He should ban
himself.!

Sam:

Rob:

I was complying. I was simply not giving you an active USCF number as
I am not an active member. USCF membership was never a condition of
joining your group now or then.

Sam:

Rob:

Thats just BS. Heck Sam you even have my phone number and I shared
information and emails with you concerning televised chess projects.

Sam:

Rob:

I never said I was an active member. Just because someone is not an
active USCF member does not make them a "fake" person. You have silly
logic, Sam.

Sam:

Rob:

I do say that. There is no other logical reason except that I held
you
accountable for your actions and your comments. Also it was because
of
me that you were censured by the USCF executive borad because you
broke the law and opend the USCF up for huge legal liabilities.

Sam:

Rob:

Did you demand his USCF ID? He never got you censured , did he? He
never pubically made a fool out of you with your own words, did he?

Sam:

Rob:

Pray tell who this stellar person may be?

Sam:

Rob:

Here is the "lie" Sam only wanted my USCF ID to either see what my
playing stregnth was or to try to diminish the veracity of my
arguments against his actions by way of me not being an active USCF
menber. Even though his group is fide_chess!  and not uscf_chess.

Sam:

Rob:

Now here comes the "real reason"

Sam:

Rob:

Rob:

Now, as Paul Harvey says, "you have the rest of the story"

Rob (which mitch) Mitchell

Must be that effect you are having on him Sam. :)

What is really funny is the way "Rob Mitchell" has gone completely
nuts ever since I banned him from my group.

Sam Sloan

Sam ,
you are a paranoid fabricator.

for the record, I was posting under the name "robmtchl" . That is
hardly a fake name. Sloans legal name is not "Sam" . He should ban
himself.!

I was complying. I was simply not giving you an active USCF number as
I am not an active member. USCF membership was never a condition of
joining your group now or then.

Thats just BS. Heck Sam you even have my phone number and I shared
information and emails with you concerning televised chess projects.

I never said I was an active member. Just because someone is not an
active USCF member does not make them a "fake" person. You have silly
logic, Sam.

I do say that. There is no other logical reason except that I held you
accountable for your actions and your comments. Also it was because of
me that you were censured by the USCF executive borad because you
broke the law and opend the USCF up for huge legal liabilities.

Did you demand his USCF ID? He never got you censured , did he? He
never pubically made a fool out of you with your own words, did he?

Pray tell who this stellar person may be?

Here is the "lie" Sam only wanted my USCF ID to either see what my
playing stregnth was or to try to diminish the veracity of my
arguments against his actions by way of me not being an active USCF
menber. Even though his group is fide_chess!  and not uscf_chess.

Now here comes the "real reason"

Now, as Paul Harvey says, "you have the rest of the story"

Rob (which mitch) Mitchell

Poor Sam. Things must be pretty boring in your little room!
You lie and lie again and again. You are a joke.

This is to remind everyone of the real reason I suspended "Rob
Mitchell" from posting to my FIDE-chess Yahoo Group, not to suppress
dissent, but because "Rob Mitchell" persistently refused to follow the
one rule of my group.

Sam Sloan

I am hereby suspending Rob Mitchell from posting to the FIDE-chess
Yahoo Group. This group has only one rule which is that everybody who
posts to the group must reveal their real name. The publicly posted
rule states: "This group does not allow anonymous postings or postings
under fake names."

It is obvious from his postings today that "Rob Mitchell" has no
intention of complying with this rule.

I now believe that "Rob Mitchell" is a fake name. I believe that he
selected this name because Rob Mitchell is one of the most common
names with 36 USCF members having the name of either Rob or Robert
Mitchell.

One factor that tipped me off that this is a fake name it the fact
that Rob Mitchell does not post to the USCF Forums although he posts
to every other active chess group. The USCF Forums is the one group
that requires that all members be USCF members. Therefore, the fact
that Rob Mitchell does not go there indicates that he is not a USCF
member.

I know that he will say that I am suspending him because he has been
attacking me lately. This is absolutely not true. Many other posters
have attacked me every day and I have never suspended them. John
Fernandez used to attack me several times a day and people were
surprised when I never suspended him.

In the five years since the FIDE-chess Yahoo group was established on
January 14, 2002, I have only suspended two chess players. One was
Steve of Alabama, now Steve of Tennessee, whom I suspended because he
refused to reveal his last name. Later, when he told me that his name
was Steve Owens, I let him back in even though he attacked me every
day and continues to do so.

The other person I suspended was known for obnoxious and objectionable
postings. There were a tremendous number of complaints about him and
at least one person had left the group because of him. (He was also
the same person who woke up Mike Nolan at 3:00 AM recently.)

In that case, I allowed him to rejoin on a promise of good behavior
and he remains a member of the group to this day.

So, the only two people I have ever suspended have since rejoined the
group and are posting there now.

"Rob Mitchell" too can be reinstated provided that he reveals his real
name and provides verifiable information establishing his identity.

Sam Sloan