Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneral TopicsAnalysisComputerChess Politics
ChessKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Chess Forum / General Topics / July 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Jakovenko's endgame

Thread view: 
Offramp - 04 Jul 2009 07:30 GMT
I found this at chessgames.com:

"Apr-21-09 [a post by...] Whitehat1963: Jakovenko's overall record
since 2006 (according to the database) playing white in games that
have lasted at least 55 moves:

+15-1=16

As a basis for comparison, using the same criteria:

Topalov: +17-4=19
Kramnk: +15-4=10
Anand: +18-5=18
Svidler: +11-2=17
Carlsen: +30-19=38
Radjabov: +10-5=14
Shirov: +9-3=9
Wang Yue: +20-7=25
Ponomariov: +8-4=16
Kamsky: +11-12=14
Pengxiang: +8-0=4".
SAT W-7 - 04 Jul 2009 08:06 GMT
That is an impressive record ..

Look at Carlsens games , lot of his games go past the 55 move mark
..Start watching him in the second half of tournaments and see if that
wears him down mentally..I belive he will be a future Worl Champ.
EZoto - 04 Jul 2009 13:58 GMT
>Kamsky: +11-12=14

A Statistic that is very telling for Kamsky.  Wonder if he knows about
this.

EZoto
chasmad - 04 Jul 2009 20:00 GMT
> I found this at chessgames.com:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> +15-1=16

What was the average rating of his opponents?  Jakovenko hasn't played
in many supertournaments, i.e. against a steady diet of 2700+ players.

> As a basis for comparison, using the same criteria:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Kamsky: +11-12=14
> Pengxiang: +8-0=4".

It's not a valid "basis for comparison" when most of the above players
were competing in supertournaments and Jakovenko was not.

Charles

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.