 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneral TopicsAnalysisComputerChess Politics ChessKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Chess Forum / General Topics / September 2007Another Goichberg Cover-up
[quote="chessoffice"]Oh, that statement is "absolutely true?" Sam, please provide motion numbers of these proposals that you claim you made and claim were voted down by the board. Last time I challenged you to cite motion numbers you then admitted you never made any such motions, but you now appear to have forgotten that. Bill Goichberg[/quote] We discussed each of these issues at length at almost every board meeting. Your excuse for not having a vote of these issues was that they could be done by the executive director without a formal vote by the board, thereby implying that these things were going to be done when you must have known by then that BILL HALL NEVER DOES ANYTHING. The Truth Bill Goichberg is that YOU ARE A LIAR. You lie all the time. Nothing you say is ever completely true, but you always shade the truth in such a way that somebody outside of the inner circle would never know where the ultimate truth lies. Just one example is your repeated claims that it was because of Sam Sloan that the AF4C pulled out of sponsoring the US Championship when the truth is that it was because of Bill Goichberg that AF4C pulled out of the US Championship, and this happened months before I was even elected to the board. A more current example is you have known all along for at least a year exactly who the Fake Sam Sloan was and you through Mike Nolan had the means all along to identify him. Nevertheless, it served your purposes to have the Fake Sam Sloan impersonating me and attacking your enemies so that you could blame all the problems the USCF faces that were caused by you blamed on me/him instead. Now you are starting this obviously bogus "internal investigation" to identify the Fake Sam Sloan, when you know perfectly well exactly who it is and now everybody else knows it too. This is just another Goichberg cover up to keep the regular members from knowing what is really going on inside the USCF. Sam Sloan [quote="tsawmiller"]I am sure this comes as no suprise to you. Post pulled due your [b]deliberate and intentional [/b]violation of the AUG rule against calling someone a liar.[/quote] I am sure that it comes as no surprise to you that I am filing a lawsuit against Goichberg and this entire criminal gang in Manhattan Federal Court on Monday Morning so it hardly matters any more. Sam Sloan [quote="tsawmiller"]I am sure this comes as no suprise to you. Post pulled due your [b]deliberate and intentional [/b]violation of the AUG rule against calling someone a liar.[/quote] Bill Goichberg is implying that I said that I made a motion. However, I never made any such statement. Thus, Bill Goichberg is implying that I made a statement that I never made. Therefore, he has committed an unethical act while accusing me of an unethical act and therefore you should pull his posting. Sam Sloan [quote="gregory"]Having someone's IP addresses available can be a wonderful thing for folks seeking some type of revenge [/quote] or for identifying perpetraters of a crime such as for example locating purveyors of pornographic, obscene and defamatory anonymous messages which, as it happens, is how the IP addresses proved useful here. Mr. Alexander, why are you so interested in protecting the identities of the Fake Sam Sloan and the Fake Ray Gordon? The Real Sam Sloan [quote="mnibb"]Mr. Sloan, although in some cases you have made a little sense in recent days, I don't think you could be more off base than with this post. This post is clearly an attempt at discussing the "risk", something we do in my industry all the time. I have found several of the recent posts here to be valuable discussion and hopefully the opinions will be considered in the future by those policy makers who might have a decision to make. In my industry we call this activity "risk avoidance" and it is entirely designed at keeping an organization out of court. As I have said, in this case you couldn't be more wrong. One other point, often a Class Action does not originate with those who have been wronged, but with a lawyer or law firm who identifies opportunity and seeks out plaintiffs. I'm not a lawyer and would have nothing to gain from a lawsuit being filed. This is about doing the right thing and avoiding risk. Mark Nibbelin[/quote] I happen to know a great deal about the judicial requirements for certifying a class action because I have studied extensively the case law on this subject and I can tell you that there is no possibility, none whatever, that the case you propose would ever reach the point of being certified as a class action. Many of your postings for the past several have been in the nature of harassment and making baseless legal threats against Mr. Brian Mottershead. Accordingly, I am demanding that the moderators pull your postings and that you be sanctioned. Sam Sloan |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.