I am not humiliated by my election defeat
samsloan - 27 Jul 2007 17:57 GMT Several pundits have suggested that I have been humiliated by my election loss yesterday, in which I received only 677 votes.
I do not feel humiliated. I was the target of the most vicious attacks ever in the history of USCF Election politics. Even Mother Theresa could not have withstood the attacks to which I was subjected. Those attacks started more than two weeks before I even took office in my first seat on the board.
Among other things, Bill Goichberg sent out more than 16,000 or 17,000 postcards attacking me, all filled with lies. Since I used the same bulk mailing company that he did, I know that the postage costs more than 24 cents each. This means that he spent more than $4,000 just to defeat me, plus printing costs.
In addition, Bill Goichberg sent tens of thousands of emails attacking me, all filled with lies. Here is a quote from his email of July 20, 2007 just five days before the votes were counted. This was the last email in time to influence the election results.
"This election is very important to the future of American chess; it is especially important that the board member who has disgraced USCF with reckless attacks and an indecent website and cost us sponsorship be removed. CLICK HERE http://www.checkmate.us/ "
Then, on his website referenced above, Bill Goichberg makes the following statement:
"In 2006 I made no public comments or endorsements, and in view of the outcome now consider this a mistake, and believe that with active campaigning I might have been able to avoid the electoral disaster (Sloan) that resulted."
Now, what is the "electoral disaster" that resulting from my election? What happened was the membership received a steady stream of information from me about what the Executive Board was doing, more information than the membership had received from any previous board. By disseminating this information, I kept a campaign promise that I made when I ran for election, when I stated that if I am elected, the Official Secrets of the USCF wlll not be secret anymore.
And what were the lies mentioned above? There are many. One is his claim that I "cost us sponsorship". Goichberg is obviously referring to his claims that it would have been possible to make deals with AF4C, Merrill, Lynch or Eric Moskow had I not been elected to the board.
All of this was a lie. Erik Anderson told Bill Goichberg at a meeting in February 2006 that he would not be putting any more money into the US Championship. Erik Anderson did not even show up for the prize awards ceremony at the conclusion of the US Championship in March, 2006. Erik Anderson's contract to organize the 2007 US Championship expired in May 2006. End of Story. At the August, 2006 meeting which was my first meeting of the board, Goichberg told the board that he had not been able to contact Erik Anderson in months because Erik Anderson would not return his calls.
That never changed. In January 2007, Henderson (not Anderson) who works for ICC said that he was preparing a proposal to be submitted to Erik Anderson. It was at that point that Erik Anderson contacted Don Schultz and told him again that he was not interested in sponsoring the 2007 US Championship.
As to a supposed deal with Merrill, Lynch, there never was any such deal. Neither Bill Goichberg nor anybody else on the board ever spoke to anybody at Merrill, Lynch with decision making authority about a deal to sponsor the US Championship.
In addition, the deal supposedly to be discussed was that the US Championship would be a knockout tournament played online with finals to be a rapid-play event in a gambling casino in Las Vegas. This proposal in part by Bill Goichberg was patently ridiculous plus it could not have been rated by FIDE and the results would not have counted for title norm purposes or qualification to the World championship cycle, as this was a zonal year. If it was me who stopped such a ridiculous deal from taking place, I would be justly proud of it, but this deal existed only in the mind of Bill Goichberg.
As far as a deal with Eric Moskow was concerned, Eric told me on the telephone in February 2007 that he would never make a deal with the USCF as long as Bill Goichberg is President. End of that story too. I wonder why Bill never mentions this fact.
In addition to being attacked in 16,000 postcards sent by Bill Goichberg, I was also attacked by Susan Polgar on her blogspot. I need not go into that one. That I will leave for my best-selling book.
What is ironic is that Bill Goichberg created the monster that is about to devour him. It was Bill Goichberg who allowed Susan's picture to appear in every issue of Chess Life for one year, even though she had done nothing newsworthy. It was Bill Goichberg who allowed her to have a cover story in Chess Life, even though the only thing she had won was a minor rapid-play side exhibition event with only one other player rated over 2400. It was Bill Goichberg who allowed her to have free ads in every issue of Chess Life for one year.
Somehow, Bill Goichberg believed that if Polgar was elected she would allow him to continue as USCF President, so he attacked me, when I represented no threat to him, none whatever.
Sam Sloan
help bot - 27 Jul 2007 21:06 GMT > "In 2006 I made no public comments or endorsements, and in view > of the outcome now consider this a mistake, and believe that with [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > What happened was the membership received a steady stream of > information And misinformation, randomly jumbled and in no particular order.
> from me about what the Executive Board was doing, more > information than the membership had received from any previous board. I don't know; there were quite a few "leaks" reported here by others such as LP over the years, so it is very difficult to judge when you consider all the misinformation tossed into the mix.
> By disseminating this information, I kept a campaign promise that I > made when I ran for election, when I stated that if I am elected, the > Official Secrets of the USCF wlll not be secret anymore. Good job, Mr. Sloan. One should always keep one's campaign promises, as a matter of principle.
> As far as a deal with Eric Moskow was concerned, Eric told me on the > telephone in February 2007 that he would never make a deal with the > USCF as long as Bill Goichberg is President. End of that story too. I > wonder why Bill never mentions this fact. Was he on the line, too?
> In addition to being attacked in 16,000 postcards sent by Bill > Goichberg, I was also attacked by Susan Polgar on her blogspot. I need [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > about to devour him. It was Bill Goichberg who allowed Susan's picture > to appear in every issue of Chess Life for one year One wonders how the USCF president can be held fully accountable for what appears in Chess Life magazine, and yet the board of directors is not.
> even though she > had done nothing newsworthy. It was Bill Goichberg who allowed her to > have a cover story in Chess Life, even though the only thing she had > won was a minor rapid-play side exhibition event with only one other > player rated over 2400. It was Bill Goichberg who allowed her to have > free ads in every issue of Chess Life for one year. Maybe the magazine needs to find another "editor" besides BG; I mean, isn't he busy enough running the USCF? Or is Mr. Sloan just confused?
> Somehow, Bill Goichberg believed that if Polgar was elected she would > allow him to continue as USCF President, so he attacked me, when I > represented no threat to him, none whatever. Interesting "logic". So we are to believe that Ms. Polgar is somehow involved in BG's dislike of SS, by way of her supposedly "allowing" BG to continue as president -- a magical power granted her perhaps by the Leprechauns or maybe it was the Elves.
-- help bot
Rob - 27 Jul 2007 22:37 GMT > > "In 2006 I made no public comments or endorsements, and in view > > of the outcome now consider this a mistake, and believe that with [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > -- help bot Instead of Sam changing his name to Ismail he should have changed it to "Tatoo" .. because I think he lives on Fantasy Island! LOL
Giles Gamete - 27 Jul 2007 23:55 GMT "samsloan" <it is especially important that the board member who has disgraced USCF with reckless attacks and an indecent website>>
You have only yourself to blame, retard. If you know that you have some scummy trash on your website, then at least have enough common sense to remove the smut before running for office last year.
Instead, you left all your bizarre weirdo garbage on your website, and enough people looked at it and realized that you are a sick pervert.
I supported you in the past, but if you are too stupid to see that some perverted crud do not belong on the website of a 65 year old man, then you do not deserve to win.
Up yours weirdo.
help bot - 28 Jul 2007 00:11 GMT > "samsloan" <it is especially important that the board member who has > disgraced USCF with reckless attacks and an indecent website>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Up yours weirdo. I wonder if Skippy has ever considered a career in writing. His unique way with words, his ability to cut through all the fluff and get right to the heart of matters would serve him well as a movie script writer, for instance. (But I'm not sure it was wise to admit to having supported a "retard" or "weirdo" who is also a "sick pervert", and this shows a certain lack of good judgment.) In any case, a safe way to try this out would be for Skip to keep his day job flipping burgers at McDonald's, and just freelance as a writer at night.
-- coach
Giles Gamete - 28 Jul 2007 00:23 GMT "help bot" <a safe way to try this out would be for Skip to keep his day job flipping burgers at McDonald's, and just freelance as a writer at night.
Why are you writing in the affected/gay third person style? And as a motivational coach, you are worth every penny.
help bot - 28 Jul 2007 03:43 GMT > "help bot" <a safe way to try this out would be for Skip to keep his day job > flipping burgers at McDonald's, and just freelance as a writer at night. > > Why are you writing in the affected/gay third person style? A third person? Are you into that kinky stuff?
I write in the first bot style, using pronouns like "I" and following up with comments about what I have read here. The fact that there are numerous people reading these posts (which is a complete waste of time, BTW) indicates that one should not necessarily write as if it were a private email from one bot to another. In all frankness, the limited intelligence of posters like IM Innes and Skippy Repa is the root cause of my writing more for the lurkers and the random others who may be reading this stuff, as opposed to the imbeciles whose postings I quote.
As they say in the business: "it's a tough job, but some-bot-y has to do it!"
-- help bot
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" - 28 Jul 2007 05:30 GMT >> "samsloan" <it is especially important that the board member who has >> disgraced USCF with reckless attacks and an indecent website>> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > day job flipping burgers at McDonald's, and just > freelance as a writer at night. At which McDonald's does he work, since you seem to know.
 Signature Ray Gordon Foxhunting: The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
FREE e-books on how to get laid!
Giles Gamete - 28 Jul 2007 06:05 GMT "Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <> At which McDonald's does he work, since you seem to know.
Fag-bot goes from McDonalds to McDonalds and hangs around in the restrooms searching for prison inmates.
help bot - 28 Jul 2007 07:36 GMT On Jul 28, 12:30 am, "Ray Gordon, creator of the \"pivot\"" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote:
> At which McDonald's does he work, since you seem to know. At the one where the manager ticks everyone off, sending him home every night with a bad case of "I hate the world"-itis. This is why no matter which fake identity Skippy posts under, he is readily identifiable by his trademark anger problem, in conjunction with a decided tendency to toss out insults like "moron", or his very favorite, "retard".
So severe is this problem that Skip feels he must constantly create new fake IDs, so that nobody will recognize him and know right off the bat that he is a nut-case. Unfortunately, this strategy fails every time and worse than that, it unveils the titanic hypocrisy of blasting others for doing what Skip does routinely: post under fake IDs to hide his true identity.
Just a short while ago Skippy admitted to having supported what he now calls a "retard", a "weirdo", and so forth, blasting Sam Sloan for not taking down his Web site when he ran for office. So, how long has this "crud" on his sleazy Web site been common knowledge? For years. Now I ask you this: how could Skip Repa have ever supported Sam Sloan, and how would not taking his site down in vain hopes of fooling people change him from supportable to a "retard"?
-- help bot
Giles Gamete - 28 Jul 2007 19:30 GMT "help bot" <> So, how long has this "crud" on his sleazy Web site been common
> knowledge? For years.> It was not common knowledge to anyone except the die-hard fag-bots who spent weeks reading every page on Sloan's website. Nobody else gives a sh.t about another man's website except a faygot, a stalker, or a nutjob. You are all three.
Thanks for doing your good deed and pointing out the pages on Sloan's website that are perverted.
help bot - 28 Jul 2007 20:33 GMT > "help bot" <> So, how long has this "crud" on his sleazy Web site been > common knowledge? For years.
> It was not common knowledge to anyone except the die-hard fag-bots who spent > weeks reading every page on Sloan's website. > > Thanks for doing your good deed and pointing out the pages on Sloan's > website that are perverted. See what I mean? This peabrain, Skippy Repa, doesn't even know that for *years*, the chess newsgroups he has been polluting have been filled to overflowing with complaints regarding Mr. Sloan's smut, his Web sites. This is precisely why I don't write my comments for him, but for those others who might be able to comprehend ideas more complex than the smashing up of chess clocks to win at bullet-chess.
It's a sad state of affairs when a boy like Skip cannot even recall what has gone on in one of his favorite sandboxes, in rgc. Such must be the state of his mind that everything is all jumbled up, and either forgotten altogether or just so randomized that he cannot seem to think at all. Does he even remember his old pal, Nick Bourbaki, one wonders?
Or how about just remembering why, as he tells us, he ever supported Sam Sloan in the first place -- that would at least be something. One could theorize that perhaps the boy read a posting by Larry Parr, suggesting that Mr. Sloan was a reformer who would rescue the USCF from evil politicos by shaking things up and revealing insider information, or tossing out the crooks. (But then, who would there be left to run things?)
All that we know for certain is that something's rotten in Denmark; the brain has ceased to function, and now the poor child wants to pretend that it was I, help bot, who just recently uncovered the smut on the SS Web site. LOL!
The truth is that I learned about this stuff from some random post on rgc, so many years ago that I cannot recall. I do remember that the offended party tried to suggest that the co-existence of Pokemon, along with Mr. Sloan's usual sex-obsessed materials was proof of his evil intentions of ensnaring unsuspecting children for sick purposes.
My take was and still is that this looks bad, but it hardly constitutes an airtight proof when you consider that there are other possibilities. One off-the-cuff idea would be to drive traffic to the site; chess traffic comes for the chess-related materials; sex fiends come for the majority of his stuff; and there are many who might come to read about Thomas Jefferson and his supposed slave children; This leaves the field wide open as to how to attract other groups, one of which might well be children.
I seriously wonder if Skippy (so named by Rob Mitchell on account of his fondness for animals of lower intelligence) has more of a deep psychological problem, rather than a mere memory lapse? Witness the desperate need for a multitude of alter identities, in conjunction with his attacks on others who have but two or three. IMO, this goes a bit beyond mere hypocrisy, and wanders into the realms of the bizarre, the freaky weird. The boy is, as he himself would put it, a weirdo of gigantic proportions.
-- doc bot
Giles Gamete - 28 Jul 2007 21:16 GMT "help bot" <Witness the desperate need for a multitude of alter identities, in conjunction with his attacks on others who have but two or three.>
Your driver's license says "Help Bot?" Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. How many other characters are you, Mr. Bot-Fly?
help bot - 28 Jul 2007 22:08 GMT > "help bot" <Witness the desperate need for a multitude of alter identities, > in conjunction with his attacks on others who have but two or three.> > > Your driver's license says "Help Bot?" Talk about the pot calling the kettle > black. How many other characters are you, Mr. Bot-Fly? And it has a picture of me as well. I truly am a handsome devil, if I do say so myself; but I ought to have combed my antennae before letting them take that picture (not that any but another bot would ever know, since I am quite invisible to humans).
As for the other question, as of right now (I don't guarantee things will always be this way) I have but one handle on rgc. Probably things would have been more fun if I had thought up another one, like IM Innes or even Skip Repa. But these losers seem to have created their alter egos in order to create the illusion of having outside support; in other words, they lack self-confidence to the degree of needing pretend "friends", and I really don't want any part of that psychosis.
And speaking of mental illness, how long before the imbecile known as Jason Repa can stop pretending to be someone else? As far as I know, it is still possible (if perhaps, unlikely) that were he to utilize a newsreader which auto-deletes words like "retard" from his postings, he might eventually be accepted as a person who has something of value to say about chess. The whole idea of using all those fake IDs is defeated by the almost unique psychological need to attack *everyone* with words like "retard", just for having some opinion or other which isn't in agreement with his own. This is reminiscent of the Evans ratpack, with their signature ad hominem approach to virtually every discussion.
Ah, and speaking of discussion, it just dawned on me that Mr. Sloan -- a man who complains of being attacked and thus deprived of another stint on the board -- himself did quite a bit of attacking here. In particular, he seemed to enjoy attacking Susan Polgar and Bill Goichberg. As attacker, he wished to be perceived as someone who fought off evil-doers, uncovered hidden secrets, and so forth. But as attackee, Mr. Sloan wants our sympathy; he wants us to think of him as a victim. Will the psychos please get help! Try the Winterpeg Sanitorium, or just try talking things over with Dr. Fine (I hear he was quite an expert on chess openings in his heyday, but he flat- out failed in helping Bobby Fischer).
-- help bot
Giles Gamete - 28 Jul 2007 22:47 GMT "help bot" <In particular, he seemed to enjoy attacking Susan Polgar and Bill Goichberg. >
It was an a.s-attack
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" - 28 Jul 2007 05:29 GMT > You have only yourself to blame, retard. If you know that you have some > scummy trash on your website, then at least have enough common sense to > remove the smut before running for office last year. Yet another past board member had direct ties to organized crime!
See? Sloan isn't the only one you can play that game with. What I say is the truth: a past USCF board member is connected to organized crime. That's a provable fact known by many in the chess community.
Does it matter? Maybe. But, I will say that if I didn't like a candidate because he was upsetting the apple carts of the self-interested, I wouldn't pretend to dislike him for an irrelevant reason such as that one, and I would suspect anyone who attempted to sway me against them on that basis.
Once you say it's not just Sloan, but the conduct, that is the issue, then the conduct of everyone should be held to the same standard.
I was actually pretty impressed with what Sloan did when he was on the board. He uncovered some things that needed to be, and opened many debates. It could have been worse, I mean, it could have been ME on the board. Unfortunately, political activists like me tend not to play in the kiddie pool. I have far bigger evils to fight than the USCF board, especially if I'd have to fly across the country to do it.
The reason USCF is run as it is is that the only people who will stick around long enough to gain power are those who really want it, and who can tolerate the subculture. That leaves about a dozen or two perennial candidates, each from different factions with different agendas, and we see the same drama play out every year while the real corporate criminals are plundering billions, not $57,000 or whatever.
 Signature Ray Gordon Foxhunting: The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
FREE e-books on how to get laid!
Giles Gamete - 28 Jul 2007 06:48 GMT "Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot"" <I will say that if I didn't like a candidate > because he was upsetting the apple carts of the self-interested, I wouldn't pretend to dislike him for an irrelevant reason such as that one, and I would suspect anyone who attempted to sway me against them on that basis.
If you had voted for Sloan based on the general idea that he was some kind of reformer and yet he did very little in terms of reforming, would you vote for him again?
If all you knew about Sloan was that most people despise him, and then you saw weird kiddie-porn art, other smut, and his free-love fantasies at his website, would you vote for him again?
The fact is that Sloan was sunk by himself. His enemies posted numerous links to the smut/trash on his website, and if Sloan were not an idiot, he would have removed the smut. He apparently is too addicted to the filth to delete it from his website. Therefore, I think the remarks about him are true. He values his filth more than being a director of the USCF. So he got what he deserves.
Ray Gordon, creator of the "pivot" - 28 Jul 2007 05:21 GMT >Even Mother Theresa > could not have withstood the attacks to which I was subjected. Wanna bet?
She endured far, far worse.
 Signature Ray Gordon Foxhunting: The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
FREE e-books on how to get laid!
me@privacy.net - 28 Jul 2007 09:57 GMT MEMO From: USCF Membership To: Sam Sloan Subject: The real message we meant to send you with our votes
: _______ : / _____ \ [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] : \ / : \___ / I hope this helps.
-- USCF Membership
marcus@stkittsnevischess.org - 28 Jul 2007 19:35 GMT > Several pundits have suggested that I have been humiliated by my > election loss yesterday, in which I received only 677 votes. [quoted text clipped - 97 lines] > > Sam Sloan Sam
You are a footnote in political history. Everyone on the usenet, on this GROUP tried to help you. YOU BLEW IT. Now, you are a footnote in political history. You are RUINED. You will never be relected to dog catcher. You had your chance, now go away like Richard Nixion.. YOU ARE DISGRACED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Marcus Roberts
samsloan - 28 Jul 2007 23:30 GMT [quote="Mulfish"]What I was getting at was that the validity of your statement that most of the attacks on Sam were unrelated to his performance on the board is undermined by your constant attacks on Paul and Susan, against whom 100% of the criticism falls into that category.
Factually, I don't believe your assertion about the disapproval of Sam being unrelated to his performance on the board is inaccurate. He certainly accused people of dumping the USCF records in landfills and of other illegalities after his term began. His tendency to make statements that are later proven false, then repeating the refuted statements after that issue dies down, has continued during his term of office. But that's really a side issue. You can't logically imply that criticism not related to board service is immaterial when that's all you do (could do) with Susan and Paul.
Your ghost-writer crack is more humorous than offensive. It's rather silly to say that someone who has publicly stated that they were not voting for them would be their ghost-writer. I try to be open-minded and to question what I consider faulty reasoning regardless of the source. Your thinking might be a little less clouded if you tried that.[/quote]
Which statements of mine were refuted?
The landfill statement was not refuted. In my one year on the board not one single document had ever been produced that comes from the files and records of the USCF.
All the old Chess Life archives have disappeared.
It has become a common running joke around the USCF that whenever anybody looks for something and it cannot be found, it is remarked, "Oh That is in the landfill."
Sam Sloan
samsloan - 29 Jul 2007 00:16 GMT Here is your actual quote, which I saved over in one of my "safe harbors" in anticipation of deletion by the moderators here:
[quote="jacklemoine"]Something seems fishy here. The only fact that makes this guy relevant to me is that "he is a dues paying USCF member."
Why does he want to be listed as Palistinian to begin with? Or Liberian or whatever before that? There is a point where an individual player's own behaviour becomes so bad that the USCF ought to consider placing its own scarce resources on other players
In short, why can't this guy take care of his own problem instead of bothering us?[/quote]
Are you saying that his behavior is bad just because he is listed as a Palestinian? Is this some sort of racial prejudice on your part?
He is a very good kid. I have known him since he was five years old, when he played in the 1986 World Under Ten Championship in San Juan Puerto Rico.
He is actually from Tegucigalpa, Honduras. I do not know why he keeps changing the spelling of his name. I assume that his distant ancestry is from Palestine. He has every right to change his name and his country if he wants to, without losing his IM title.
Sam Sloan
[quote="jacklemoine"]I'm so confused. Now I don't know whether I'm the real or the fake Jack Le Moine. I'll go ask my wife.
As for your points, first about the Polgar flamers, they're embarrassing. Even to a diehard Polgar supporter like me. They leave all of us good guys open to cracks like the one above. I'm still having a hard time over Susan giving George such a good write-up for flaming the other candidates. Finally, Paul Truong did post a disagreement and she modified her own big write-up to include that but still. I fear that that sort of thing has given the rest of you guys something to hold that over our heads till kingdom come.
As for the flag of convenience, from what you describe, it seems that a better comparison would be professional sports. Few of the Atlanta Braves come from Atlanta, and most will go to another team as soon as they're free to do so and a better offer is made. Come to think of it, that's a pretty good analogy to what you're describing.
Still and all, it all seems to very icky to me. As for the politics, I'm trying hard not to judge, just wonder.
Let's say it was 1940 and a player decided he wanted to represent Nazi Germany. Given Hamas' very public and prolific statements about Jews, extermination and their individual leader's open admiration of Hitler and the Nazi's (e.g. "they had the right idea"), this isn't a bad analogy, either.[/quote]
Now you are calling Jorge Zamora of Honduras, about whom you know nothing other than the fact that he changed his name and his country affiliation, a terrorist just because he is of Arab descent.
Meanwhile, the rest of us are starting to learn something about the Real Jack LeMoine.
Sam Sloan
Rob - 29 Jul 2007 14:06 GMT Sam Sloan was given his one chance to prove he could do something other than complain. He was censured a record number of times, did nothing worthwhile and was summarily voted out of office. He may have gotten his lowest number of votes ever.
He violated Federal employment law while a member of the board. Cast out wide and unsubstantiated claims costing the USCF valuable time and money to respond to and investigate wild goose chases.
He legally changed his name to Ismail Mohamed Sloan but continues to play in USCF events and run for office under an assumed name.
He regularly posted pornographic cartoons aimed at adolescents on his personal website and openly wrote about and boasted of his "conquests" of adolescent girls. The greatest sign of Hope for the USCCF is it's members weren't stupid enough to reelect him.
samsloan - 29 Jul 2007 20:48 GMT I have just been informed that this entire thread has been pulled by the Forum Oversight Committee over on the USCF Forums.
No reason has been given. Note that only a few of the posts were by me.
Sam Sloan
Giles Gamete - 29 Jul 2007 21:06 GMT "samsloan" <> I have just been informed that this entire thread has been pulled by
> the Forum Oversight Committee over on the USCF Forums. I guess they all want to forget you exist.
|
|
|